Enhance your patent search with AI.
Try the FREE AI-powered tool
Guides

Prior Art Search: A Short Guide

Prior Art Search: A Short Guide

The term “prior art” is central to patents, influencing numerous aspects of intellectual property.

Its existence significantly impacts which innovations are granted patent protection,  which patents are deemed valid and enforceable, or whether a business can safely launch a product or enter a new market without risking infringement, and so on.

This guide discusses prior art and the prior art search process, and their crucial role in an effective IP strategy.

In this guide

What is prior art?

The term “prior art” refers to any publicly available information, which includes patents, patent applications, scientific literature, technical publications, product manuals, and other technology disclosures that describe similar or related inventions or technologies.

In the United States, the legal definition of prior art is set out in 35 U.S.C. § 102, which defines prior art as public disclosures that are “patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.”

What is a prior art search?

A prior art search is a process that involves searching for and examining existing publicly available information to determine if an invention is novel and non-obvious.
The goal of a prior art search is to uncover relevant technology disclosures that predate an invention, or in the context of patents, the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Prior art is important in determining the patentability of an invention, validity of a patent, and can potentially impact the ability of a business to bring its products and services to market.

Why conduct a prior art search?

In the different stages of the innovation cycle, a prior art search may be conducted to serve various purposes:

What are the types of prior art search?

Depending on the specific objectives, prior art searches can be categorized into four distinct types, each serving a different purpose:

  1. Patent Invalidity Search
  2. Patentability Search
  3. Freedom to Operate Search
  4. State of the Art Search
Types of prior art search.png

Patent Invalidity Search

A patent validity or patent invalidity search is conducted to assess the validity and therefore, the enforceability of an existing patent. One of most common reasons for conducting this type of prior art search is in aid of patent litigation or in the event of a patent infringement suit.

Patent Litigation and Post Grant Proceedings

In a patent infringement suit, a defendant may choose to declare non-infringement. Another course of action is to  invalidate the claims of the asserted patent. In order to invalidate the claims of a patent, there must be evidence of prior art.

Apart from patent litigation in federal courts, the defendant may opt to use the patent invalidation mechanisms provided by the USPTO such as the inter partes review and post grant review, among others. These post grant proceedings are held before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and may offer a faster and cheaper resolution compared to costly patent litigation.

Regardless of where a defendant chooses to litigate, there must be a thorough prior art or patent invalidity search conducted to prove that there is prior art.

Patent Licensing and IP Strategy

A comprehensive patent validity search is a crucial component of of a well-informed IP strategy.

  • Before acquiring or licensing a patent, the buyer or licensee must make sure that the patent claims are indeed valid in view of the prior art to avoid potential legal risks
  • As a risk management tool, a prior art search can assess the strength of a patent. Can it withstand patent challenges before the courts and other proceedings? This is an important step before a patent holder decides to enforce their patent and engage in patent litigation.

Patentability Search

A patentability search, also known as a novelty search, is conducted to identify any prior inventions, publications, or other publicly available information that may be relevant to the invention.

Though this type of search is not a predictor for patentability, it can help a patent attorney evaluate the likelihood of obtaining a patent and provide a patentability opinion. This type of search aims to identify prior art that could potentially hinder the grant of a patent due to lack of novelty or non-obviousness.

A patentability search is a complete must before filing a patent application. It offers valuable insights to strengthen the drafting of the patent application, provide ideas for design-around, etc. It is ideal to conduct this type of prior art search even at the early stages of ideation, allowing for a more informed decision regarding R&D direction.

Freedom to Operate Search

A freedom to operate (FTO) search, also called a “clearance search” is conducted before introducing a new product or service to the market. This search identifies existing patents and other intellectual property rights that may potentially be infringed by the new product or service.

As patent rights are territorial, this type of prior art search is important before entering a new region or market.

The main focus of this prior art search is to determine if there are existing patents in a given jurisdiction that disclose the same elements as the new product or service.

A freedom to operate search will be the basis for a freedom to operate opinion that will be provided by a patent attorney.

State of the Art Search

A State of the Art (SOA) search, also called a Collection search, is conducted to assess the existing technical advancements in a particular field. It identifies prior art relating to a certain technology which provides insights regarding the patentability of an invention, infringement risks, evaluation of the inventive step, among others.

This wider scope of a prior art search not only identifies technologies that are similar to your idea or invention, but also “competing art” which are technologies that solve the same problem but in a different way.

How do I conduct a prior art search?

Here’s a basic framework for conducting a prior art search.

  1.  Define the invention and set the scope.
    Every prior art search starts with a thorough understanding of the essential features or the “inventive concept” of the subject matter or claimed invention. Define the “effective filing date” of the invention. This forms the basis of your search criteria.
  2. Identify keywords and classifications.
    Build a list of keywords and keyword strings associated with the invention. Apart from text searching, patent classification codes (CPC or IPC) can improve the precision of the search and narrow down your pool of results.
  3. Use patent search databases.
    Utilize reputable, publicly available patent databases such as Google Patents, Espacenet and the USPTO. For non-patent literature searching, include academic journals, and conference proceedings etc.There are also patent search tools that use AI and machine learning to perform prior art search. One AI-powered patent search tool is PQAI or Patent Quality Artificial Intelligence. It is an open source, non-profit initiative by AT&T and the Georgia Intellectual Property Alliance.
  4. Optimize and analyze results.
    A prior art search is an iterative process, and requires continuous optimization. Refine search queries based on your initial results. Combine various search strategies, e.g. keywords search + CPC.
  5. Keep detailed records of relevant references.
    A typical prior art search report will include a claims mapping or technical mapping chart which maps the claims of a patent or the elements of an invention to the references found. Download a sample report here.
  6. Get a patent search provider.
    As a comprehensive prior art search can be a daunting task, enlisting the help of patent research professionals can also be beneficial. Find a research partner that understands both the legal and technical aspects of a prior art search, and has a proven track record in providing quality results.




Book a consultation

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

What our clients are saying

“The first search Parola Analytics, Inc. performed for us provided the key reference supporting our invalidity position on a patent we were evaluating.”
A middle-aged man with short gray hair, glasses, and a suit stands indoors near a window, appearing deep in thought as he considers a patent and prior art search, with office buildings visible in the background.
Sean M. Dean, Ph.D.
Fish & Richardson
"Parola analysts uncovered prior art that even opposing counsel’s team could not during litigation.

The quality of their work and deeper understanding of the subject matter were instrumental to the case that we eventually won.”
Man in a dark suit and striped tie smiling with arms crossed against a plain gray background.
Saqib J. Siddiqui
Mayer Brown
“We have worked with Parola on two matters, and both times, Parola delivered outstanding results.

Parola’s highly-relevant search results and reports demonstrated a thorough understanding of the patent claims.”
A man wearing glasses and a suit with a striped tie, smiling at the camera, sits in front of a blurred indoor background—his confident demeanor suggests expertise in patent and prior art search.
Daniel Kiang
Knobbe Martens
“Vincent Violago and his excellent team at Parola Analytics provide high quality, detailed, prior art search results with minimal oversight and handholding.

These guys are highly educated and experienced in their field and work together with great efficiency. The work product is top-notch.” Read more
A man with dark hair wearing a suit and tie, posing for a professional headshot against a plain gray background—ideal for profiles related to patent and prior art search services.
James A. Fussell III
Mayer Brown
“The team at Parola Analytics did an excellent job in providing us with the highest-quality prior art research service.

The team’s search report highlighted the best prior art references with an easy-to-understand format. In short, the team proved itself.”
A man wearing a dark suit, light blue tie, and checkered shirt, smiling at the camera with a neutral gray background.
Ryan Phelan
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun
"We have been impressed with Parola Analytics search results for mechanical devices and software-related inventions.

Each report impacted the decision regarding how to proceed with IP protection."
A middle-aged man with short hair, glasses, and a suit jacket smiles at the camera against a plain background.
John Boyd
FisherBroyles
“Parola Analytics is our trusted partner for prior art search contests on PATROLL, Unified Patent’s crowdsourcing platform.

With their expertise in prior art searching, Vincent and his team at Parola Analytics are valuable partners in reviewing prior art submissions to our contests." Read more
A man in a suit and tie smiles at the camera against a neutral background.
Sam Jaffna
Unified Patents
“I recently engaged Parola Analytics to conduct a prior art search on a difficult U.S. patent that had already stymied another search firm that delivered two unusable references.

Parola found four much better references in two weeks that demonstrated a deeper understanding of the search and an effective selection of the best references."
Man in a business suit and red tie smiles at the camera against a plain, light gray background, reflecting confidence often needed for successful patent and prior art search endeavors.
Barry Shelton
Shelton Coburn
"Parola’s success is based on a singular strength, the quality of its analysts.

With their scientific and engineering background, coupled with their keen insights into emerging technologies and trends, Parola’s team proved the ideal partner for Fastinform in our complex and time-sensitive challenge." Read more
A man with short brown hair and a trimmed beard smiles at the camera indoors, as blurred people discuss patent and prior art search by a window in the background.
Marius Meland
Founder, Law360

Gated Content

Name

Sign up to get access​

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Please provide accurate and verifiable contact information to ensure proper use of our materials and prevent misuse. Thank you for your understanding!
Name*
Important: To prevent misuse of our materials, all report download requests undergo a verification and approval process. Providing your email does not guarantee immediate access.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Sign up to get access

Please provide accurate and verifiable contact information to ensure proper use of our materials and prevent misuse. Thank you for your understanding!

Important: To prevent misuse of our materials, all report download requests undergo a verification and approval process. Providing your email does not guarantee immediate access.

Subscribe to our newsletter