Iterative search development
Collaborating closely with the patent team to develop and refine search parameters, ensuring precise coverage of the US patent landscape.
The Challenge
A global cloud communications company required a comprehensive patent landscape analysis covering the VoIP and unified communications space. The objective was to support competitive threat analysis, patent portfolio analysis, litigation review, claim analysis, and white-space analysis across a broad set of telephony-related technologies.
The project required more than a simple patent count; the research needed to capture a wide range of VoIP features, from account management and call handling to unified communications, cloud storage, infrastructure as a service, and emerging software-based capabilities, while also separating highly relevant patents from broader or adjacent filings.
The Solution
A multi-phase research plan was executed in close collaboration with the patent team, including search parameter development, iterative refinement, manual relevancy review, and a final structured report. The search covered U.S. patents and applications, targeting both key competitors and the broader patent landscape.
OUR APPROACH
Our impact
For companies operating in fast-moving communications markets, a strong patent landscape is essential for competitive positioning, licensing decisions, and portfolio planning. This analysis provided a structured view of both the crowded and underdeveloped parts of the VoIP landscape to guide strategic action.
The tangible value created for the client included:
Need a clearer view of your technology landscape?
Our patent landscape studies help organizations understand competitive activity, identify innovation opportunities, and make informed decisions on R&D, portfolio development, and IP strategy.
The challenge
A cloud communications company needed to analyze a vast, crowded VoIP patent landscape to identify competitive threats and strategic opportunities.
Why it worked
Multi-phase category segmentation
The analysis went beyond simple patent counts, manually reviewing and organizing more than 6,600 patent assets into 18 distinct technical categories.
The outcome